[2026:RJ-JP:15788] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6777/2026 Sukhjilal S/o Bhagirath, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Pilwanadi Ke Kinor, Tehsil Malarna Dungar, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Distt. Collector, Distt. Sawaimadhopur. 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Malarna Dungar, Distt. Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Singhal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :- "It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the order dated 13.10.2025 (Annexure-5) may kindly be quashed and set aside and by an appropriate order or direction, the respondent No.2 (Distt. Collector Sawaimadhopur) may kindly be directed to conduct fresh enquiry into the matter and site of the land may be inspected in the presence of the petitioner and then necessary order or directions be issued to the respondent No.3 to record the name of the petitioner in the revenue record of the land allotted on 12.05.1976 under landless agriculturist & SC quota and accordingly, tenancy rights over the said land be given to the petitioner in the interest of justice. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the [2026:RJ-JP:15788] (2 of 2) [CW-6777/2026] facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. Mr. Vinod Kumar Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner had filed a representation dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure-6) before respondent No.2 – District Collector, Sawaimadhopur, however, till date, the same has not been considered and thus, respondent No.2 be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 3. Taking note of the limited submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without delving into the merits of the matter, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the said representation dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure-6) submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation(s) and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation(s) in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /2