Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5861 (JHR)

JAMAL KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1624/2026 · 2026-04-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10682] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1624 of 2026 1. Jamal Khan, aged about 65 years, son of Gafur Khan, resident of Sindur, Near Shiv Mandri, P.O. Hazaribag, P.S. Sadar Hazaribag, District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 2. Salim Khan @ Md. Salim Khan, aged about 54 years, son of Gafur Khan, resident of Village Katkamsandi, P.O. and P.S. Katkamsandi District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 3. Samsul Arfin Khan, aged about 60 years, son of Abul Hasan Khan, resident of Sindur Merawal, P.O. Hazaribag, P.S. Sadar Hazaribag, District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sahil, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 15.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 239 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners happened to be the raiyat of Plot No. 2476, Khata No. 17 and have sold 5.5 decimals of land to informant by a registered sale deed dated 30.03.2016. He next submits that now the allegations are made that when the purchaser has gone to do some construction work [2026:JHHC:10682] -2- over the land in question, some other persons have objected the same. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the obstructions have been made by some other persons. 5. Considering that the said sale deed has already been executed in favour of the informant on 30.03.2016 and now objection has been made by some other person, in that view of the matter, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-15.04.2026 Amitesh/-