Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5861 (BOM)

JIJABHAU TUKARAM SHINDE v. DEELIP VITHALRAO GADGE

CA/9663/2026 · 2026-09-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 928 ca 9663.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9663 OF 2026 IN CRAST/25704/2026 JIJABHAU TUKARAM SHINDE VERSUS DEELIP VITHALRAO GADGE ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.R. Shaikh h/f. Bayas Anandsingh Sangramsingh ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 01.09.2026 P.C.:- 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 8 days caused in filing the revision. 2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant. 3. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Revision be registered. 2026:BHC-AUG:39781 ( 2 ) 928 ca 9663.26 Civil Revision Application : 5. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 30.09.2026. In addition to regular mode, the learned advocate for the applicant is permitted to serve the respondent by private mode. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] mubashir