Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5860 (AP)

MEDIDI VENKATESWARULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21055/2024 · 2026-07-14

B S Bhanumathi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders: - Date of pronouncement : 15.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010404872024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday, the 15th day of July, 2026 Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 21055 of 2024 Between: Medidi Venkateswarulu and others ...Petitioners and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: 1. A. K. Kishore Reddy Counsel for the respondents: 1. Chintapalli Srinivas 2. G.P. for Home 3. G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following: 2 W.P.No.21055 of 2024 ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings initiated by the respondent No.3 in M.C.No. 6 of 2022 and taking possession of the land through the respondent No.4 in an extent of Ac. 10.85 cents situated at survey Nos. 133, 134 and 135 of Ulimeswaram village, Peddapuram mandal, Kakinada district (erstwhile East Godavari district) under Section 145 and 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and restraining the petitioners from entering into the land without culminating M.C.No. 6 of 2022 without having any power or authority as the proceedings in A.T.C. No. 5 of 2017 and A.T.C. No. 4 of 2018 are pending before the Special Officer for Tenancy Case-cum- Additional Junior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, Kakinada district, (erstwhile East Godavari district) is nothing but illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, highhanded and violative of the procedure contemplated under Sections 145 and 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure apart from violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently quash the proceedings in M.C. No. 6 of 2022 pending on the file of the respondent no.3 and pass…” 2. Sri G. Divyatheja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, is present. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and filed a memo dated 07.07.2026 to that effect. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 3 W.P.No.21055 of 2024 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 15.07.2026 NSM Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 W.P.No.21055 of 2024 35 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 21055 of 2024 Dated: 15.07.2026 NSM