Mathan alias Mathan Kalidoss alias Kavin Sandron v. The Regional Passport Officer
WP(MD)/21334/2026 · 2026-07-28
M Dhandapani
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58570 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58570 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 Mathan @ Mathan Kalidoss @ Kavin Sandron ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Municipal Water Tank Building, 1st Floor, W.B. Road, Tiruchirappalli East, Tiruchirappalli District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Town Police Station, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to directing the respondents to complete the police verification process and consider and dispose of the petitioner's passport application dated 02.02.2026 in Reference No.26-1051706762 for reissue of passport within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.U.M.Berdin Vinodh For Respondents : Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz (R2 & R3) Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to complete the police verification process and consider and dispose of the petitioner's passport application dated 02.02.2026 in Reference No.26-1051706762 for reissue of passport within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had applied for the reissuance of a passport. However, the application has not been processed on the ground that enquiry is pending against the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 submitted that enquiry is pending against the 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 petitioner and that the same are under investigation. 4.The issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra. An identical issue has already been decided by the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in W.A.No.902 of 2023 [The Regional Passport Officer, Chennai v. Samsudeen Mohamed Salih and another], by judgment dated 02.06.2023, the relevant portion of which is extracted hereunder: ''5. A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, in the case of Abbas Hatimbhai Kagalwala v. State of Maharashtra and another, 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 1992, to which one of us (S.V.Gangapurwala, CJ.) was a party, has followed the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu, supra and
directed the respondent therein to process the application of the petitioner for renewal of the passport.
6. The contention of learned counsel for the appellant that the first respondent cannot travel abroad without the permission of the Court where the criminal case is pending, would not be an impediment for the passport authority to consider the application for 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 renewal of the passport. No doubt, if the first respondent has to travel abroad and the criminal case is pending, then unless the Magistrate or the Sessions Court where the criminal case is pending permits the first respondent to travel abroad, he cannot travel abroad.
7. In the light of the above, we pass the following
order: (i) The writ appellant shall process the application of the first respondent for renewal of passport without insisting for permission of the Court, where a criminal case is pending against the first respondent. If the first respondent is travelling abroad, then the first respondent would be required to seek permission from the Court where the criminal case is pending. (ii) Decision shall be taken as above, within one month.'' 5.Following the aforesaid decision, the first respondent is
directed to process the petitioner's passport application without insisting upon an order or permission from the jurisdictional criminal Court where the enquiry is pending against the petitioner, and to take an appropriate decision 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 on the application, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, if the petitioner intends to travel abroad, it is open to the petitioner to obtain the necessary permission from the jurisdictional criminal Court before undertaking such travel. 6.With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 28.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No ps To 1.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Municipal Water Tank Building, 1st Floor, W.B. Road, Tiruchirappalli East, Tiruchirappalli District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 3.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Town Police Station, Thanjavur District. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 M.DHANDAPANI, J. ps W.P(MD)No.21334 of 2026 28.07.2026 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis