RAMJILAL S/O RAMRATAN v. VAYAPAR MANDAL NAIMANDI HINDAUNCITY
CFA/761/2025 · 2026-03-13
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5857 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5857 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10761] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 761/2025
1. Ramjilal S/o Ramratan, R/o Shiv Colony Hindauncity District Karauli (Deceased) 1/1. Kailashsahai S/o Ramratan, R/o Shiv Colony Hindauncity District Karauli (Deceased) 1/2. Mahendra S/o Kailashsahai, Adopted Son Late Ramjilal R/o Shiv Colony Hindauncity District Karauli ----Appellants Versus Vayapar Mandal Naimandi Hindauncity, Through Its President Pardeep Garg S/o Ruggilal R/o Hindauncity District Karauli ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. J. P. Goyal, Sr.Adv. With Ms. Jyoti Swami, Mr. Shrawan Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/03/2026
1. The matter was listed on 05.03.2026, and the following order was passed by this Court:
"1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that during pendency of the present first appeal, the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.01.2025 has already been executed and possession of the suit property has been handed over to the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to take updated instructions in the matter.
3. List the matter on 10.03.2026"
2. Today, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant(s), even in the second round.
[2026:RJ-JP:10761] (2 of 2) [CFA-761/2025]
3. From the ordersheet, it is evident that after execution of the decree dated 17.01.2025, the appellant is not seriously interested in pursuing the present civil first appeal.
4. Accordingly, the present civil first appeal is dismissed in default.
5. The stay application, and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/147