Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5856 (HP)

PARTH ARORA v. STATE OF HP

CRMMO/347/2026 · 2026-04-24

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.347 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 _______________________________________________________ Parth Arora …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva and Mr. Nishant Walia, Advocates (through video conferencing) and Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh application before the appropriate Court of law for preservation of CDR. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, application, if any, for preservation, as detailed hereinabove, shall be considered and decided by the Court below expeditiously. 2. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 24, 2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?