MANGESH SIDDHARTH JADHAV AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
APPLN/3571/2026 · 2026-08-31
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5856 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5856 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P-1-Cri-Apln-3571-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3571 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 719 OF 2026
1. MANGESH SIDDHARTH JADHAV
2. SIDDHARTH MAGAN JADHAV VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .… Mr. Pravin D. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. M. Ganachari, APP for Respondent - State .…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. DATE : 01 September, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. The motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the
order dated 31.08.2026.
3. This Court, on 29.08.2026, heard the application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. However, no specific mention was made that the fine amount is already paid or not.
Learned counsel today specifically mentioned that the fine amount 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:39381 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
(( 2 )) P-1-Cri-Apln-3571-2026 is not paid. This fact has been brought to the notice of this Court after the order on the application for suspension of sentence is passed. Be that as it may.
4. The learned APP has also pointed out that the applicants have not paid the compensation as directed by the trial Court. All these facts shall be considered at the time of hearing of the appeal. The appeal may not be heard unless the fine amount is paid.
5.
Learned counsel for applicant further pointed out that, in paragraph 4, line no.16, instead of "accused No.1", it should be
"accused No.3".
6. Taking into consideration the same, necessary corrections be made and corrected copy be uploaded.
7. Motion is accordingly disposed off accordingly.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //