Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10677] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3999/2026 Dashrath S/o Sukhlal, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Khatkalan, Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawaimadhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teekaram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 13/03/2026
1. This 2nd bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.14/2026 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology Act.
2. First bail application filed by the accused-petitioner bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1586/2026 was dismissed as withdraw by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2026 with liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since
10.01.2026. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery.
[2026:RJ-JP:10677] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3999/2026]
4.
Learned counsel further states that no other criminal case is pending against the present accused-petitioner.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
7. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, the 2nd bail application is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner named above shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
9. In case, the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /7