1 HN, J W.P.No.33356_2015 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010410242015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33356/2015 Between: 1. BONDADA KAMESWARI,, W/O. LATE RAJAJI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.6-1-1, S.A.ROAD, TUNI TOWN AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS VICE- CHAIRMAN. 3. THE TUNI MUNICIPALITY, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 4. THE TUNI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TUNI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of 2 HN, J W.P.No.33356_2015 Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in trying to demolish the property of the petitioner situated in D.No.6-1-1, SA.Road, Tuni Town and Mandal, East Godavari District for the purpose of road widening without any notice and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's property without following due process of law and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 43027 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the property of the petitioner situated in D.No.6-1-1, SA. Road, Tuni Town and Mandal, East Godavari District for the purpose of mad widening, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pa Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. K V SIMHADRI 3. . 3 HN, J W.P.No.33356_2015 ORDER: 1. This Court, vide order dated 08.10.2015, after considering the apprehension of the petitioner that the respondent Municipality was likely to take over the petitioner’s property without following due process of law, directed the respondent Municipality not to demolish the petitioner’s property and observed that due process of law shall be followed in the event the petitioner’s property is required for road widening. 2. Ms.V.Sirisha Rani, learned Standing counsel, appears for respondent No.3. 3. Recording the same, the present writ petition stands disposed off in terms of the interim order granter earlier by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 HN, J W.P.No.33356_2015 119 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33356 of 2015 Date: 20.07.2026 NKA