Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 585 (RAJ)

BASKALA D/O PURKHARAM, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/367/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 367/2026 1. Baskala D/o Purkharam, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of 16 A S Kupli Barani Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335703. 2. Mohan Lal Son Of Lal Chand, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 3 B G M Jaitsar Srivijaynagar 3 Bgm Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335703. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Ganganagar, District Ganganagar. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Ramsinghpur, District Ganganagar. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Jetsar, District Ganganagar. 6. Purkharam S/o Lekhram, Resident Of 16 A S Kupli Barani Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335703. 7. Kalavati W/o Purkharam, Resident Of 16 A S Kupli Barani Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335703. 8. Ramchandra Son Of Manphul, Resident Of Village Motasar, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 9. Likhmaram Son Of Unknown, Resident Of Village Motasar, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 10. Ramkrishna Son Of Likhmaram, Resident Of Village Motasar, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 11. Jaipal Son Of Ramchand, Resident Of Village Motasar, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 12. Punam Son Of Ramkrisha, Resident Of Village Motasar, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 13. Jaipal Son Of Purkharam, Resident Of 16 A S Kupli Barani Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335703. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:10335] (2 of 3) [CRLW-367/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Rajput Mr. Ram Singh Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 to 13 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur 20.02.2026 and same has been registered on 20.02.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 to 13 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before [2026:RJ-JP:10335] (3 of 3) [CRLW-367/2026] respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Jetsar, District Ganganagar and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /213