Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5849 (HP)

SADA RAM v. THE HPTDC AND OTHERS

EX.P./1042/2024 · 2026-04-27

Ajay Mohan Goel

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:13599 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 1042 of 2024 Decided on: 27.04.2026 Sada Ram … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation, Shimla and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the respondents informs the Court that all the emoluments, to which the petitioner was entitled to, stands released in his favour, except the arrears of revision of pay scale, which, in light of the pendency of the review petition, are not being released. This Court is of the considered view that in the backdrop of the above mentioned facts, this execution petition can be disposed of and is disposed of with the directions to the respondents that as far as the arrears of revision of pay scale are concerned, the same shall be governed by the outcome of the review petition and in case, the Corporation does not succeed in the review petition, then due and admissible amount on account of revision of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:13599 pay scale be released to the petitioner within eight weeks as from the disposal of the review petition. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 27, 2026 (narender)