State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Musiri v. Maruthambal
CRL OP(MD)/13560/2026 · 2026-07-23
A D Jagadish Chandira, R Poornima
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58446 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58446 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.O.P(MD)No.13560 of 2026 in CRL.A(MD)SR.No.28515 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.07.2026 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA CRL.O.P(MD)No.13560 of 2026 in CRL.A(MD)SR.No.28515 of 2026 State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. (Crime No.133 of 2022) ... Petitioner vs. Maruthambal ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 419(3) of BNSS 2023, to grant leave to file an appeal before this Court against the acquittal judgment in S.C.No.234 of 2023 dated 01.08.2025 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Christopher Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.] The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the petitioner would submit that despite the evidence of the eyewitnesses, the learned trial Judge only taking into consideration that the witnesses have not attempted to Page No.1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.O.P(MD)No.13560 of 2026 in CRL.A(MD)SR.No.28515 of 2026 nab the accused, had disbelieved their evidence. He would further submit that there is no discussion with regard to the recovery of the weapon and the tallying of the blood group with the scientific evidence. He would also submit that the accused had surrendered on the next day of the occurrence and had also made a confession statement.
2. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/accused would submit that the trial Court rightly taking into consideration the contradictions in the evidence of the witnesses, disbelieved the same and acquitted the respondent/accused.
3. Having gone through the records, we find that it is a fit case for grant of leave.
4. Leave granted. Accordingly, this petition is allowed.
[A.D.J.C., J.] [R.P., J.] 23.07.2026 bala To: The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. Page No.2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.O.P(MD)No.13560 of 2026 in CRL.A(MD)SR.No.28515 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. AND R.POORNIMA, J. bala CRL.O.P(MD)No.13560 of 2026 in CRL.A(MD)SR.No.28515 of 2026 23.07.2026 Page No.3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis