ATUL KUMAR YADAV S/O SHRI MOHARSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4102/2026 · 2026-03-25
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5842 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5842 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12517] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4102/2026 Atul Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Moharsingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Post Ratanpura, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) Currently Patwari, Parwar Halka Kohri, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) At Present Confined In The Central Jail, Alwar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Special Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg assisted by Mr. Ripudaman Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 25/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.54/2026 registered at Police Station C.P.S Jaipur, District ACB District for offences under Section 7 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he demanded a bribe of Rs.15,000 for carrying out the mutation of the complainant’s land. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.02.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take
[2026:RJ-JP:12517] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4102/2026] considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Atul Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Moharsingh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/51