2026:UHC:3748 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 1 9 3 1 / 2 0 2 4 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Vashisth, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Learned State Counsel also endorses the said statement. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.05.2026 Mahinder/