Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:1289
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 467 of 2026
Decided on: 06.01.2026 Attar Singh
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. H.C.Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant AG. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner is that the application which has been submitted by the petitioner with the Authority as far as back as in the year 2017 for correction of certain entries has not been dealt with by the authorities. He further submits that thereafter also, an application was filed by the petitioner with the Authorities i.e. Annexure P-3, yet no action has been taken thereupon also. Accordingly, he prays that this petition be disposed of with the direction to the authorities to decide the application filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, within some reasonable time
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:1289
period.
3.
In light of the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, without making any observation on the merit of the case or the maintainability of the application also, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the Authority shall take an appropriate call on the application of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today after hearing the petitioner and all other stakeholders. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge January 06, 2026 (narender)