Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5834 (KAR)

SMT. NAGARATHNA L D/O BHOJYA NAYAK v. SHRI PRABHAKARA M PATIL

CCC/100345/2025 · 2026-02-11

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2045-DB CCC No. 100345 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100345 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. NAGARATHNA L. D/O BHOJYA NAYAK, AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR, R/O. TER BEEDI, 19TH WARD, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, TQ. HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583 212. … COMPLAINANT (BY SRI BALLOLI SHIVRAJ SIDDARAM, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI PRABHAKARA M. PATIL, AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. CHIEF OFFICER TMC, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583 212, NOW TRANSFERRED TO MUDALIGI TMC, MUDALIGI-591 312, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI M.K. MUGALI, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. CHIEF OFFICER TMC, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583 212. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, R/BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY. … ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING AND NOT ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 21/02/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P. NO.101366/2025 AND ETC. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2045-DB CCC No. 100345 of 2025 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) Learned counsel for the complainant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the contempt petition, which reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The counsel for the Complainant most humbly submits as here under: It is submitted that, the top-noted Complaint has rendered infructuous, hence this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the top-noted complaint. Hence this Memo.” 2. In view of the memo filed and the submission made therein, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE SSP CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4