Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5832 (RAJ)

ABDUL RAHIM S/O KADAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4144/2026 · 2026-03-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12519] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4144/2026 1. Abdul Rahim S/o Kadar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Jogi Danda Chatikana Thana Kotwali Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli) 2. Abdul Gafoor @ Chhote S/o Kadar Khan, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Jogi Danda Chatikana Thana Kotwali Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/03/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.64/2026 registered at Police Station Karauli, District Karauli for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. No specific act or injury has been attributed to the present petitioners, and their name is not mentioned in the FIR. As per the FIR, no specific act of inflicting injury has been attributed to any of the co- accused. Petitioners are behind the bars since 26.02.2026 without [2026:RJ-JP:12519] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4144/2026] any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Abdul Rahim S/o Kadar and Abdul Gafoor @ Chhote S/o Kadar Khan, be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/52