Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5831 (JHR)

MD. IRFAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1233/2026 · 2026-04-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10243 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 1233 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1233 of 2026 Md. Irfan Ansari, son of Harun Miyan, aged about 30 years, resident of Village- Amba Tola, Dhanwar, Nagarbarsot, P.O. & P.S. Barhi, District- Hazaribag … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Awanikant Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 02/09.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.446/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 69, 3(5) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the relationship was established before four years of lodging of the FIR. He submits that in view of that, the petitioner may kindly be granted anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that by way of concealing his caste, the petitioner has established relationship. He further submits that the petitioner has made obscene video and made it viral and by way of blackmailing, he has demanded Rs.4 Lakhs. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the relationship was there since last four years, however, the petitioner has concealed his caste. The allegations are also there that the petitioner has made obscene video, which has been made viral. The allegation of demand of Rs.4 Lakh is ( 2026:JHHC:10243 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 1233 of 2026 also there by way of blackmailing. Having the friendship is one of the aspect but taking dignity of any woman and privacy are serious matter. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and, as such, his prayer for anticipatory bail is, hereby, rejected. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th April, 2026 Ajay/