Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5831 (ALL)

ROHIT YADAV @ LAVISH v. SMT. NEHA YADAV

A227/12215/2026 · 2026-09-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12215 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "1- To direct the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharanpur to decide the Matrimonial Case No. 796 of 2024, Rohit Yadav @ Lavish Versus Smt. Neha Yadav, under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, pending before him as expeditiously as possible within a stipulated period as directed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that a Matrimonial Case No.796 of 2024 is pending consideration before Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharanpur, which may be decided expeditiously. 3. Section 21-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "Act of 1955") provides as under : "21-B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of petitions under the Act.? (1) The trial of a petition under this Act shall, so far as is practicable consistently with the interests of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day until its conclusion unless the court finds the adjournment of the trial beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded. (2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of the petition on the respondent. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rohit Yadav @ Lavish .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Neha Yadav .....Respondent(s) (3) Every appeal under this Act shall be heard as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the hearing within three months from the date of service of notice of appeal on the respondent." 4. As the Act of 1955 itself provides for deciding the divorce petition within fixed period of time, there is no need for issuing a separate direction to the Court concerned. 5. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharanpur to proceed in accordance with Section 21B of Act of 1955. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2026 SK Goswami A227 No. 12215 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad