HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7828 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for State and Sri R.V. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent-Bank. 2. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there are certain mistakes in the array of respondents, therefore, this petition may be dismissed with liberty to file fresh. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. March 19, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshuman Singh, Santosh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.V. Pandey (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Aman Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad