Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 58280 (MAD)

K.DHILIP v. M.KUMAR

CMP/545/2026 · 2026-07-30

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.545 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.184478 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH , J Notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with, since he remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. 2.This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 125 days in filing the above appeal. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 4.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 125 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. 5.Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel, at the time of admission. 6.It is made clear that for the period of delay of 125 days, the claimant will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 30.07.2026 ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis