2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3571 BA1 No.760 of 2026 Sajid Hasan Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Crime No.190 of 2026 under Section 8 read with Section 21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, P.S. Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that FIR is totally false and fabricated; there is 2 hours delay in lodging the FIR; on the basis of suspicion, without following the norms police conducted search of the applicant, which is not permissible. He submits that there is no compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act. He further submits that that the contraband recovered is below the commercial quantity. 5. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Sajid Hasan be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 11.05.2026 Arti