[2026:RJ-JP:10510] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8224/2025 Mohammed Mustak S/o Mohammed Ismail Qureshi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1219, Mardan Khan Ki Gali, M. D. Road Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302004 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor 2. Nandlal Meena S/o Norati Lal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Badoli Kolwa, Kolwa, Dausa, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yash Takhar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Ranvijay Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2026 1. Petitioner and complainant are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.471/2025 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 along with all consequential proceedings arising thereto. 3. In pursuance of order dated 12.01.2026, learned Public Prosecutor places on record factual report. As per which, complainant has settled his dispute and entered into compromise [2026:RJ-JP:10510] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8224/2025] with the petitioner-Mohammed Mustak, however no compromise has been submitted in respect of the remaining accused persons. 4. Complainant is present in person along with his counsel. Under his instructions, counsel submits that the complainant has entered into a compromise with all the accused persons and he does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. 5. Considering the material made available for perusal including the factual report and the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.471/2025 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) along with all consequential proceedings arising thereto, are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /75