HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26282 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. List revised. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Name of Sri Praveen Singh, learned counsel appear as counsel for the first informant but he is not present. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 168 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 123 BNS and Section 3/4 (2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Bhawanpur, District Meerut, during the pendency of the trial. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and there are material contradictions in the statement of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS. It is further submitted that the age of the victim has been found to be around 14 years as per her certificate of Class 8th, however, there is no High School certificate or the certificate of school first attended and no radio-logical examination of the victim has been conducted for her age determination. It is further submitted that the medico-legal report of the victim does not support the commission of rape on her. It is also submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Tandon, Arvind Kumar, Vivek Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A., Praveen Singh Aman Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 24.5.2026 and he is having no criminal history. It is lastly submitted that in case the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts, however, it is submitted that the victim is a minor girl aged about 14 years and she in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has supported the allegations of commission of rape on her. 6. As per the allegation in the FIR, the applicant is said to have enticed away the daughter of the first informant aged about 16 years, however, the victim has been recovered and there appears to be material contradictions in the statement of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS as she in her statement under Section 180 BNSS has stated that the the applicant took her to bushes where he committed rape on her and thereafter she was taken on bike whereas in her statement under Section 183 BNSS she has stated that the applicant took her to bushes and committed rape on her and she was left there. The age of the victim has been found to be around 14 years as per her certificate of Class 8th, however, there is no High School certificate or the certificate of school first attended and no radio-logical examination of the victim has been conducted for her age determination and the medico- legal report of the victim does not support the commission of rape on her. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 24.5.2026 and he is having no criminal history. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All BAIL No. 26282 of 2026 2 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 8. Accordingly, the present application is ALLOWED. 9. Let the applicant- Aman Kuamr involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant BAIL No. 26282 of 2026 3 through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685. September 8, 2026 Abhishek BAIL No. 26282 of 2026 4 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad