Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010038102026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/615/2026 CHAMAN NAHAR LASKAR W/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 2: DR. MONSUF AHMED LASKAR S/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 3: MD. MASOOM AHMED LASKAR S/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 4: MISS ABIDA BEGUM LASKAR D/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR ALL 1 O 4 ABOVE ARE PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF VILL. RONGPUR PT-III P.O. SILCHAR-9 P.S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD REGISTERED OFFICE ATMIDDLETON STREET, KOLKATA,AND ONEOF THE REGIONAL OFFICES KNOWN ASGUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, G.S.ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-5. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. O LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/4 In Case : MFA/135/2013 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MIDDLETON STREET KOLKATA AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFIES KNOWN AS GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE G.S .ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5 HAVING ONE OF ITS DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT SILCHAR VERSUS MUSTT. CHAMAN NAHAR KASKAR and 5 ORS W/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 2:DR. MONSUF AHMED LASKAR S/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 3:MD. MASOOM AHMED LASKAR S/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR 4:MISS ABIDA BEGUM LASKAR D/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR ALL 1 O 4 ABOVE ARE PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF VILL. RONGPUR PT-III P.O. SILCHAR-9 P.S. SILHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM. 5:TUSHAR KANTI PAUL S/O RAKESH CHANDRA PAUL R/O HOSPITAL ROAD WARD O. 22 P.O. RANGIRKHARI P.S. SILCHAR Page No.# 3/4 DIST. CACHAR ASSAM. 6:SUJIT DAS S/O LATE SUKHOMOY DAS R/O BAITHAKHAL BASTI SALGOI P.O. SALGOI P.S. PATHARKANDI DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR.R K BHATRA Advocate for : MR R DEB R 1 TO 4 appearing for MUSTT. CHAMAN NAHAR KASKAR and 5 ORS With MFA Case No. 135/2013, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 14.05.2026 [1] Heard Mr. O. Laskar, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Biyani, the learned counsel representing the insurance company. [2] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that though this interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant, praying for return of the original pension payment order which was exhibited as Exhibit-6 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, however, he submits that on inspection of the records which is available before this court, the original pension payment order is not found therein. Therefore, he Page No.# 4/4 submits that the applicant is not pressing the instant interlocutory application. [3] Accordingly, this interlocutory application is dismissed on not being pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant