M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER NG v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
WP(C)/4898/2025 · 2026-05-05
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5816 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5816 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010161602025
2026:GAU-AS:6210
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4898/2025 M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER NG A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY NIRMALI GOGOI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O PRABHAT GOGOI, REGISTERED OFFICE AT H/NO. 46, SIMANTA PATH, BASISTHA CHARIALI, GUWAHATI-781029, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSMA, PRINCIPAL OFFICE AT CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOL, MISSION PATTY, WARD NO. 3 OF GOLAGHAT TOWN, MOUZA- MOUKHOWA, P.O., P.S. AND DIST- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785621 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, POWER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, J BLOCK, LOK SEWA BHAWAN, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED (APGCL) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BIJULI BHAWAN 3RD FLOOR PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED (APGCL) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BIJULI BHAWAN 3RD FLOOR PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 4:SAURAV SAIKIA CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (H AND C) I/C APGCL BIJULI BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM 5:LAKWA THERMAL POWER STATION REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER MAIBELLA P.O.- SUFFRY DIST- CHARAIDEO ASSAM PIN-78568 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. D. Roy, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
06.05.2026
Heard Mr. S. D. Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. D. Nath, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the APDCL.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, taking into account that the disputes in the present proceedings would require factual adjudication, the Petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition and avail remedies in terms with Clause 19
Page No.# 3/3 of Chapter 3 (“Instructions to the Bidders”) of the Special Conditions of the Contract document.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in terms with Clause 19 of the “Instructions to the Bidders” for settlement of disputes.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant