Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010087372026 2026:GAU-AS:6670 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1460/2026 PAWAN KUMAR TIWARI SON OF ADYA PRASAD TIWARI, COMMANDANT (IRLA NO. 3119), RTC CRPF AVADI, CHENNAI (TAMIL NADU)- 600065 VERSUS GOVIND MOHAN, IAS AND 5 ORS. THE SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 2:G. P. SINGH IPS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE (CRPF) BLOCK NO. 1 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI- 110003 3:RAJA SRIVASTAVA IPS THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR OF POLICE NORTH EASTERN ZONE CRPF GUWAHATI 4:SANDEEP DATTA THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (TRG) TRAINING DTE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE NEW DELHI Page No.# 2/3 5:P. R. JAMBHOLKAR THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (OPS) CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE POLICE COMPLEX ROWRIAH JORHAT ASSAM 6:JAYANT KUMAR THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADM.) OPS SECTOR CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE JORHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T KALITA, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : Cont Case(C) Filing No. 4981 of 2026 SHRI PAWAN KUMAR TIWARI SON OF ADYA PRASAD TIWARICOMMANDANT IRLA NO. 3119RTC CRPF AVADICHENNAI TAMIL NADU 600065 VERSUS SHRI GOVIND MOHAN IAS SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRSNEW DELHI ------------ Advocate for : HARSHIT AGARWAL Advocate for : appearing for SHRI GOVIND MOHAN IAS Linked Case : IA(Civil) Filing No. 4982 of 2026 Page No.# 3/3 SHRI PAWAN KUMAR TIWARI SON OF ADYA PRASAD TIWARICOMMANDANT IRLA NO. 3119RTC CRPF AVADICHENNAI TAMIL NADU 600065 VERSUS SHRI GOVIND MOHAN IAS SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRSNEW DELHI ------------ Advocate for : HARSHIT AGARWAL Advocate for : appearing for SHRI GOVIND MOHAN IAS BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN 11.05.2026 Heard Mr H Gupta, learned counsel and Mr S Barua, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, who submit that the contempt application has become infructuous in view of the fact that the order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the Writ Appeal filed by the Department. 2. In view of the same, the learned counsels has submitted that they have instructions to withdraw the matter as the same has become infructuous. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the matter is closed with a liberty to file afresh, if required. JUDGE Comparing Assistant