1 6-ra-141-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 141 OF 2026 IN WP/8342/2026 Varad Sanjaykumar Kantewar VERSUS State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another ... Mr. G. L. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent-State ….. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :- . Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. 2. In the application itself, it is stated that the Review Application is filed only for limited purpose as after the order passed by this Court dated 28.07.2026, the applicant got admission to the college namely College of Engineering, Pune to Engineering Course. The last date of submission of the validity certificate is stated to be till the end of the fourth CAP round. The applicant, therefore, requires the certificate validated within a period of one month. 3. By the order passed by this Court, this Court had infact considered all these aspects. It was pointed out to the Court that the 2026:BHC-AUG:39731-DB 2 6-ra-141-2026 proposal itself was filed on 21.05.2026. In that view, this Court had directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the claim within six months. 4. Now, the applicant seeks that even that period be curtailed. If it was the case, the applicant ought to have approached the Scrutiny Committee well in advance. In the present case, applicant who himself waited for a long period and did not submit the proposal in time, now expects all the concerned Authorities to act in prompt manner. This Court has already directed the Scrutiny Committee in dozens of matters to decide the claims within the stipulated period. At the same time, the Committee is required to obey the directions issued this Court in many matters and proposals. The committee is also required to follow the procedure before deciding the validity claim. 5. Considering all above, this Court finds that the request made by the Review Applicant is not reasonable. A Review Application in fact cannot be entertained for such purpose. There is no merit in the Review Application. Review Application stands dismissed. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Rushikesh/2026