Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5813 (JHR)

DYNAMIC ENTERPRISES, PARTNER NAMELY SHIV RAM MEENA v. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER

WPC/2013/2026 · 2026-04-13

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10535-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2013 of 2026 1. Dynamic Entreprises, Head Office situated at 65, Globus Township, Near Indralok Nagar, Ratlam – 457 001, Managed by Partner namely Shiv Ram Meena, aged about- 62 years, S/O Rewar Mal Meena, R/O Makan No. 65, Globus Township, Near Indralok Nagar, P.O. Ratlam, P.S. Alkapuri Ratlam, Ratlam- 457 001 (Madhya Pradesh) …. … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, the department of South Eastern Railway Through its General Manager at 11 Garden Reach Road, P.O. South Eastern Railway, P.S.- Garden Reach, Kolkata 700043 (West Bengal) 2. Divisional Railway Manager (Engg.) South Eastern Railway Hatia Ranchi, P.O. –Hatia, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. Divisional Railway Engineer, South Eastern Railway Hatia Ranchi, P.O.- Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). 4. Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, South Eastern Railway Hatia, Ranchi, P.O. Hatia P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Venkatesh Kumar, Advocate For Respondents: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI Mr. Radha Krishna Gupta, C.G.C. Ms. Shivani Jaluka, AC to ASGI --------- 02/Dated: 13.04.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy, inter alia, by invoking the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties. 3. Leave is granted to withdraw the petition with liberty as prayed for. 4. All contentions of all parties on merits of the matter are left explicitly open since this Court has not adjudicated upon them. 5. I.As., if any, will not survive and are disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 13.04.2026 N.A.F.R. APK/Vedanti Uploaded on 15.04.2026