Manik Laximan Totare v. The Union of India, Through the General Manager, Central Railway,
CA/9606/2026 · 2026-08-28
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5810 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5810 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 945.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9606 OF 2026 IN FA/616/2026 MANIK LAXIMAN TOTARE VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant Kondiram AGP for Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Preeti Diggikar … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :
1. This Application is filed for bringing LRs of deceased Applicant nos. 1, 4 and 7, on record by condoning the delay and to correct the middle name of Applicant no. 1 to 5.
2. It is stated that the middle of name of Applicant nos. 1 to 4 is shown as ‘Laximan’ which ought to be ‘Laxman’ and the middle name of Applicant no. 5 is shown as ‘Shripatrao’ which ought to be ‘Shripati’ in the title clause of First Appeal and Civil Application filed therein.
3. In view of the averments made in the Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘A-1’, ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’ and ‘D-1’. 2026:BHC-AUG:39965
2 945.odt
4. The necessary corrections in the middle name of Applicant nos. 1 to 5 shall be carried out and bring the legal heirs of Applicant nos. 1, 4 and 7 on record, within a period of two weeks.
5. The Civil Application stands disposed of.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) SPC