Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:3803 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PMS/ 1 3 9 1 / 2 0 2 6 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Dushyant Maihnali, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Devendra Singh Bohra, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
2. Petitioner has sought a direction to the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mahuwakheraganj, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar to assess the property tax in respect of building No. 7/291 situate at Ward No. 7.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that writ petition is misconceived, as there is a title dispute going on between petitioner and respondent No. 4 regarding same building. He submits that petitioner’s name cannot be mutated in the Municipal record till his title is cleared in the pending suit.
4. Mr. Dushyan Mainali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner then submits that there is Notification issued on 28.10.2011 under Uttarakhand Right to Service Act, 2011, which provides remedy to the petitioner. He submits that Chief
2026:UHC:3803 Development Officer is the competent authority to decide the appeal.
5. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum available to him in law.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.05.2026 Mahinder/