Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5808 (KAR)

ISMAIL HAROON ALIYAS HAROON SHAIKH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103530/2022 · 2026-02-12

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2186 CRL.P No. 103530 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103530 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. ISMAIL HAROON @ HAROON SHAIKH A/A 49 YEARS, BUSINESS R/O. VALISHA GALLI, YELLAPUR UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 581359. 2. AMEER HUMZA ISMAIL SHAIKH A/A 26 YEARS, MECHANIC R/O. VALISHA GALLI, YELLAPUR, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 581359. 3. RAJIYA W/O ISMAIL SHAIKH A/A 49 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD R/O. VALISHA GALLI, YELLAPUR, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 581359. 4. JEBA W/IO ASGAR MOMIN A/A 29 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD R/O. NEW GANDHI NAGAR, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI DISTRICT 591104. 5. GURUPRASAD SHIVAYOGI MURTHY A/A 34 YEARS, BAR BENDER R/O. MUNDGOD ROAD, YELLAPUR UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 581359. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.P. HEGDE AND VIJAY MALALI, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE HUKKERI POLICE STATION BELAGAVI DISTRICT CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.13 12:47:16 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2186 CRL.P No. 103530 of 2022 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR DHARWAD BENCH 580011. 2. BUSHERA D/O MEHANDI MOMIN (BUSHERA AMIR HUMJA AS PER COMPLAINT) A/A 20 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD R/O. KHAN JAADE ONI, HUKKERI, BELGAGVI DISTRICT 581309. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, F.I.R. AND CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED BY HUKKERI POLICE IN CRIME NO. 0003/2022 AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING REGISTERED AT C.C.NO. 461/2022 BEFORE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. HUKKERI OF BELAGAVI DISTRICT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM / LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12