Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5808 (GAU)

DHANANJOY BARMAN AND ANR v. THE UNION OF INDIA

I.A.(Crl.)/442/2026 · 2026-05-07

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010051902026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : I.A.(Crl.)/442/2026 DHANANJOY BARMAN AND ANR S/O SRI SURJYA BARMAN R/O 49 2 RAMCHARRA HIGH SCHOOL VILL. RAMCHARRA P.O. RANGA PANIYA P.S. BISHALGARH DIST. SIPAHIJALA TRIPURA 799102 2: PINTU DEBBARMA S/O LATE BAMBROY DEBBARMA R/O VILL. DUSKI P.O. DUSKI BAZAR P.S. TELIAMURA DIST. KHOWAI TRIPURA 799203 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE SILCHAR SUB REGIONAL UNIT SILCHAR ------------ Advocate for : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for : SC DRI appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA BEFORE Page No.# 2/2 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 08.05.2026 Mr. S. C. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for impleading the DRI as the Prosecuting Agency in place of NCB which was wrongly impleaded as respondent and prays that necessary correction may be done. Prayer is allowed. Registry shall do necessary amendment in the cause title. Accordingly, this Interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant