HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8929 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. raised an objection by submitting that the applicant No.1 has a criminal history of four cases and the applicant No.3 has a criminal history of three cases, which have not been explained as is required under the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub-Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 2. On being confronted with this objection, the Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application explaining in detail the complete criminal antecedents of the applicants in view of the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub-Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by the Learned counsel for the applicants, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above-mentioned liberty. 4. Certified copies may be returned to the Learned counsel for the applicants. September 9, 2026 Sachin Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Shyam Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad