1 2026:CGHC:17157 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2909 of 2022 * - Prashant Kurre S/o Shri Bed Prasad Kurre Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Tolhi Chua, Post- Puchheli, Tahsil And Police Station Pathariya, District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry And Dairying, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Veterinary Services, Indrawati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Dy-Director Veterinary Services Behind Collectorate Office, Karhi Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Dy-Director Veterinary Service Gourav Path Utai Road, Padnabhpur, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - Shubhendra Singh Rajput S/o Shri Ramnath Rajput Aged About 23 Years R/o Village, Post And Tahsil Pandariya, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4/ State : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/ writs, order/ orders, direction/ directions to the respondent authorities and the appointment order of the respondent no. 5 on the post of Assistant Veterinary field officer, dated 10.12.2021 (Anne. P-8) may kindly be cancelled. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.15 19:20:45 +0530 2 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Veterinary field officer, in pursuance to the advertisement dated 07.10.2021 (Anne. P-3), in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs order/orders, direction/directions to the respondent no. 3 to consider the objection as raised by the petitioner, objectively, and to take appropriate action against the respondent no. 5 in the interest of justice. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti