Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5800 (KAR)

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA v. DINESH SINGHI S/O LATE SRI UDAICHAND SINGHI AGE 51YEARS OCC PARTNER OF M/S BHARAT MINES AND

CRL.P/100061/2023 · 2026-02-11

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2057 CRL.P No. 100061 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100061 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUDLIGI DIST BALLARI THROUGH THE ADDL STATE PUBLIC, PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD, BENCH 580011. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) AND: 1. DINESH SINGHI S/O LATE SRI UDAICHAND SINGHI AGE 51YEARS OCC. PARTNER OF M/S BHARAT MINES AND MINERALS R/O. DOOR NO.37 SONGHI SADAN 2ND FLOOR INFANTRY, RAOD INNA REDDY COLONY, CANTONAMENT BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI 583104. 2. LAXMIPAT DUDHERIA S/O LATE SRI. KANNAIAHAL DEDHERIA AGE. 54 YEARS R/O. DOOR NO. 37 SINGHI, SADAN 2ND FLOOR INFANTRY ROAD, INNA REDDY COLONY, CANTONMENT BALLARI DIST BALLARI 583104. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CR.PR.P N. 116/2019 ON THE FILE OF R P. SESSION JUDGE AT BALLARI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.10.2020 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE AT BALLARI THEREBY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.04.2019 PASSED BY THE JMFC SANDUR IN CC NO. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.12 16:54:37 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2057 CRL.P No. 100061 of 2023 1040/2017 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED THE PRESENT RESPONDENTS/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S (1), (1A,) 21(1) OF M.M.D.R. ACT, 1957 R/W 379 OF IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4