[2026:RJ-JP:12180] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 432/2026 1. Jyoti Parewa D/o Shri Panna Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Akoda, Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) At Present Village Sursura, Tehsil And P.s. Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) 2. Vishnu Khateek Son Of Shri Kailash Khateek, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Sursura, Tehsil And P.s. Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer. 3. The S.h.o., Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. 4. Panna Lal Parewa Son Of Late Shri Laxman Ji Parewa (Father Of The Petitioner No. 1), R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Akoda, Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Shiv Prasad Parewa Son Of Panna Lal Parewa (Brother Of The Petitioner No.1), R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Akoda, Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Manoj Parewa Son Of Panna Lal Parewa (Brother Of The Petitioner No.1), R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Akoda, Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Jankilal Parewa Son Of Panna Lal Parewa (Brother Of The Petitioner No.1), R/o Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Akoda, Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Happy Sharma with Mr. Prashant Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 7 as they [2026:RJ-JP:12180] (2 of 2) [CRLW-432/2026] are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that both the petitioners are unmarried. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live- in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 06.03.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN/268