Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5794 (AP)

V.Subbayamma C Surya Nirmala, w/o. Nageswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10584/2015 · 2026-07-19

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.10584_2015 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010745362015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10584/2015 Between: 1. V.SUBBAYAMMA C SURYA NIRMALA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 3-1-480, 3-1-480/B & 3-1-481, BESIDE KANKARAGUNTA BRIDGE, JUTE MILL ROAD, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P.SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE A P CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ET URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A. P SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN. 3. GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR. 4. THE CITY PLANNER GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GUNTUR, - 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT, - 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/L A O GUNTUR GUNTUR DIST, - 7. SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY REP BY ITS GENERAL, MANAGER, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD. 8. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY OFFICER DIVISIONAL OFFICER GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly 2 HN, J W.P.No.10584_2015 one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 3 & 4/their subordinates in demolishing a portion and further trying to demolish the shops/Residential premises of the petitioner with No:3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3-1- 481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill Road, Guntur, without following due process of law, notice or opportunity and under th colourable exercise of the power/extraneous considerations and as per their ; whims and fancies, as arbitrary, illegal, against principles of natural justice, contrary to orders in W.P.NO: 29085 of 2011 on 2-11-2011, and voilative of Art.300-A of constitution of India and consequently to retrain the respondents from 'demolishing any portion of the, , petitioner'S shops No:3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3- 1-481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill R ad, Guntur, without following due process of law/payment of just compensation, in the Interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 14000 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents 3 & 4 /their subordinates from demolishing any portion of the shops/ Residential premises of the petitioner with No. 3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3-1-481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill Road, Guntur, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 59464 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3 HN, J W.P.No.10584_2015 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, aggrieved by the proposed action of demolishing the shops/residential premises of the petitioner without following the due process of law. 2. This Court, vide order dated 13.04.201, granted stay of demolition of the petitioner’s property. 3. Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.3, submits that no further action could be taken in pursuance of the interim orders of this Court. 4. Recording the same, the present writ petition is disposed off, directing respondent No.3 to initiate appropriate action against the subject construction by issuing appropriate notices, calling for the petitioner’s explanation, and thereafter passing appropriate final orders. Till such exercise is completed, the respondent shall not disturb the possession and enjoyment of the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 HN, J W.P.No.10584_2015 101 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10584 of 2015 Date: 20.07.2026 NKA