Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5791 (KAR)

SHEKHARAPPA S/O NINGAPPA TALAWARA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/100250/2019 · 2026-02-06

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1785 CRL.P No. 100250 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100250 OF 2019 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHEKHARAPPA S/O NINGAPPA TALAWARA AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSMEN, R/O: GORBAL NOW AT JOSHI GALLI ILKAL, TQ: HUNNGUND, BAGALKOT DIST. 2. SHARANAPPA THIMMANATTI, S/O RANGAPPA TIMMANATTI AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSMAN, R/O: WARD NO.2 HANUMANAL, TQ: KUSTAGI, KOPPAL DIST. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. ANWAR BASHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH GANGAVATHI RURAL P.S. REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD. 2. SRINIVASA B. S/O VENKATESHWARA RAO AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSMAN, R/O: VIDYANAGAR, TQ: GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DIST. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; NOTICE SERVED TO R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, FIR, CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED IN CRIME NO.228/2018 BY GANGAVATHI RURAL POLICE Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1785 CRL.P No. 100250 of 2019 OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 447, 341, 379, 511, 504, 506, 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC GANGAVATHI AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERE TO SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) None appears for the petitioner. As a last chance, this matter was adjourned to today noting the absence of the counsel for petitioners. 2. Criminal petition is of the year 2019 challenging order taking cognizance and issue of process. 3. Therefore, there are no good grounds to attend the matter. 4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK_Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 102