Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5791 (GAU)

PIPUL AHMED v. KUMAR SANJAY KRISHNA, IAS AND ANR.

Cont.Cas(C)/300/2020 · 2026-05-19

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010098772020 2026:GAU-AS:7023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/300/2020 PIPUL AHMED S/O- LT. SAHAR ALI @ SAHAR AHMED, R/O- VILL- KHUDRA PALAHA, P.O. BAIHATA CHARIALI, DIST.- KAMRUP (R), PIN- 781381, ASSAM VERSUS KUMAR SANJAY KRISHNA, IAS AND ANR. THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM AND THE CHAIRMAN, STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06 2:M. ANGAMUTHU IAS COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR A CHALIHA,MR P NAYAK,MR. B GOGOI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 20.05.2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a probability Page No.# 2/2 that the orders passed by this Court have been complied with, since the petitioner has not contacted the counsel over a long period of time. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to agitate a fresh grievance, if any, arising out of any subsequent orders passed by the respondent authorities. JUDGE Comparing Assistant