--1-- Neutral Citation No. (2026:JHHC:10056) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1412 of 2026 ---- A.M. .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Vandanda Bharti, Advocate For the Informant : - Mr. Kaushik Sharkel, Advocate ---- 02/08.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.78 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 498-A & 376 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and false allegation made against the petitioner, who is the husband to force the wife to have relationship with friend of the petitioner. He submits that in view of the matter, anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant jointly oppose the prayer and submits that serious allegation is made against the petitioner as he has forced --2-- the wife to have relationship with his friend and on these grounds, they submit that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the F.I.R. it is alleged that the petitioner was forcing the wife to have relationship with his friend and that allegation against the husband is serious. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 08.04.2026 Jay/