Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.02.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No. M/L.218
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 2463 of 2025
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 114 of 2025 dated 31.01.2025 under Sections 4/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 read with Sections 126(2)/74/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
And
In Re : Rimon Ali alias Riman ... Petitioner.
Mr. Soupal Chatterjee, Mr. Prabir Kumar Das
... For the Petitioner.
Ms. Shaila Afrin, Mr. Sufi Kamal
... For the State.
Ms. Mekhala Kar
... For the de facto complainant.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 215 days; charge-sheet has been submitted and charges have already been framed. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that considering the period of detention, further custody of the petitioner is unwarranted. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as the medical documents which are available.
2 Having considered the sections under which the petitioner has been charged, prima facie, I am of the view that at this stage, the prosecution case is tilted in their favour. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 2463 of 2025, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)