Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5786 (AP)

Killi Seshu Mohan Appala Naidu v. ANDHRA BANK

WP/31134/2018 · 2026-07-13

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010642382018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2018 Between: 1. KILLI SESHU MOHAN APPALA NAIDU, S/O LAXMANA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, NEAR GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, AMADALAVALASA MUNICIPALITY, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA BANK, REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BANK STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD 2. THE ANDHRA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, AMADALAVALASA BRANCH, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI SEEPANA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SIMHADRI, PROPRIETOR, M/S LOKESH STORE CRUSHERS, R/O CHINTHALABADAVANGI KARAKAVALASA POST AND PANTHAYAT, L.N. PETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent Bank in not permitting the petitioner to clear off the total arrears of the 3rd respondent loan account and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct 2 the 2nd respondents Bank to grant permission to the petitioner to clear the total arrears of the loan account of the 3rd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent Bank to permit the petitioner to clear the total arrears of the loan account of the 3rd respondent by duly considering the representation dated 14-12-2017 made by the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH S V SURAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V DYUMANI 2. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri Ch.S.V.Suraj, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that a memo dated 04.07.2026 has been filed before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. The same is placed on record. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 14.07.2026. JLV 4 142 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2018 Date: 14.07.2026 JLV