Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5785 (RAJ)

MANISH BULIWAL S/O SHRI PANNA LAL BULIWAL v. SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE

CCP/571/2025 · 2026-03-28

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 571/2025 Manish Buliwal S/o Shri Panna Lal Buliwal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 3-C-5, Shiv Mandir Ke Pass Ki Gali, Vikas Nagar, Bundi (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health And Family Welfare And Panchayati Raj (Medical And Health) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health And Family Welfare And Panchayati Raj (Medical And Health) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay, Adv., Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Adv. & Ms. Monisha Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/03/2026 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner for alleging non compliance of order dated 10.02.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1493/2025, whereby directions were given to the petitioner to submit representation before the Competent Authority. [2026:RJ-JP:13108] (2 of 2) [CCP-571/2025] 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that as directed by this Court vide order dated 10.02.2025, representation filed by the petitioner has been considered and decided vide order dated 31.08.2025 by the Competent Authority. The order dated 31.08.2025 is taken on record. 3. There is no one to controvert the above factual statement. 4. In view of above, there is no case of deliberate and willful non compliance on the part of the respondents. The contempt petition is hereby dismissed. 5. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /49