SUNIL VISHNOI S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4337/2026 · 2026-03-25
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5784 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5784 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12686] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4337/2026 Sunil Vishnoi S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dayakaur, Police Station Lohawat, District Falaudi (Rajasthan) (Presently lodged at Central Jail, Kota). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 25/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 68/2026 registered at Police Station R.K. Puram District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 and 8/18 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is young person, aged about 25 years. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery comprises 510 grams and 502 grams of opium from two separate bags. Additionally, 674 grams of opium-doda powder along with the gunny bag has been recovered from the applicant. It is contended that the total quantity recovered of the recovered contraband is less than the commercial quantity prescribed under the NDPS Act, and therefore, the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not be
[2026:RJ-JP:12686] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4337/2026] attracted in the present matter. It is further submitted that the applicant is in judicial custody since 26.02.2026 and there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant. It is also urged that the present case deserves consideration on exceptional grounds, as the marriage of the applicant is scheduled to be solemnized on
02.04.2026.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is aged about 25 years; that the applicant is behind bars since 26.02.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that marriage of the applicant is going to be solemnized on 02.04.2026 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sunil Vishnoi S/o Shri Omprakash shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-169