Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5784 (JHR)

SOBHA KUMARI ALIAS SHOBHA KUMARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./764/2026 · 2026-04-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10429] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.764 of 2026 ------ 1. Sobha Kumari @ Shobha Kumari, Wife of Late Ashok Prasad, D/o- Late Shyam Sunder Singh, aged about- 67 years, resident of 85A, Mariyampur, P.O., P.S. and District- Koderma. 2. Abhay Anand, Son of Late Ashok Prasad, aged about- 38 years, resident of 85A, Mariyampur, P.O., P.S. and District- Koderma and at present resident of 201, Usha Enclave, Road No. 03, Near Punjab and Sindh Bank, Singh More, Hatiya, P.O. & P.S. - Hatiya, District- Ranchi … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P. P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-04-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 19.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 19.01.2026 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to inadvertence on the part of the advocate’s clerk, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 19.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 19.01.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the facts of the case and the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.1848 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-10.04.2026-Animesh/