Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16111 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Shri Alok Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, during the course of investigation, certain graver sections has further been added.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. September 9, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Prabodh Dubey, Rakesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Kumar Rai, G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Jaykesh Nishad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad