Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5783 (GUJ)

RAJESHBHAI LAXMANBHAI PARMAR @ PARIKH v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCA/7061/2024 · 2026-03-16

Nirzar S Desai

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7061 of 2024 ========================================= RAJESHBHAI LAXMANBHAI PARMAR @ PARIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================= Appearance : MR KM SHETH for the Petitioner. MR MITUL GAUTAM, AGP for the Respondent No.1. NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No.1,2,3,4,5,7 REFUSED SERVED (N)(10) for the Respondent No.6. ========================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 16/03/2026 ORAL ORDER Mr. Mitul Gautam, learned Assistant Government Pleader places on record photocopy of the resumption report given by the petitioner dated 1.8.2025 stating that pursuant to the statement made by learned AGP on 24.7.2025, he has resumed the duty on 1.8.2025. Learned AGP, under instructions, states that as the petitioner is performing his duties since 1.8.2025, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. When the matter was called out, learned advocate for the petitioner Mr. K. M. Sheth was absent. Therefore, the Court could not ascertain anything from learned advocate for the petitioner. However, considering the statement made by learned AGP Mr. Gautam, in view of the fact that now the grievance of the petitioner is redressed and in view of the reinstatement of the p. 2 petitioner, the present petition has become infructuous as stated by learned AGP. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to Ale fresh petition if the grievance of the petitioner still survives. Notice is discharged. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) SAVARIYA