Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5781 (RAJ)

DEVIRAM S/O HEERASINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3469/2026 · 2026-03-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 3469/2026 1. Deviram S/o Heerasingh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Jasauti, Ps Pahadi, Dist. Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Special Central Jail Shyalawas, Dausa) 2. Hoshiyar Singh S/o Hargovind Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Khedli Lodha, Ps Laxmangarh, Dist Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Special Central Jail Shyalawas, Dausa) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Hemendra Goyal Mr. Manvendra Singh, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/03/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.173/2024 registered with the Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offence under Sections 143, 302, 323 and 341 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the material made available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:12360] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3469/2026] 4. The second bail application of the petitioners bearing No.13035/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 10.10.2025 with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh bail application after examination of the Medical Jurist, who has conducted Post mortem of the deceased. Subsequent to dismissal of the second bail application, there is no material change in circumstance except the fact that the Doctor, who conducted the postmortem of the deceased, has been examined. The statement of the Doctor, who conducted the postmortem of the deceased, also in no manner supports the case of the petitioners. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the allegation against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, this third bail application filed by the petitioners is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /10